Do away with Bitcoin As soon as and For All

QuestionsDo away with Bitcoin As soon as and For All
Autumn Ferretti (Spanien) asked 3 månader ago

For me Bitcoin changes absolutely everything. Here is where we arrive at the key constraints: There’s only so much computation modern hardware can perform per unit time – only so many signatures that can be verified and state changes verified. Now, if you take a much looser view of security, and you are content to have a small number of very performant nodes doing all of the validation, then you can create more block space, and drive fees effectively to zero. Ultimately, the Sybil-resistance mechanism used is largely irrelevant to the question of fees. Most crucially, fees promote a competitive environment among miners which in turn makes it prohibitively expensive for single parties to successfully attack a network. It simply means that the two most popular blockchains both use PoW and are somewhat congested, leading to high fees (Ethereum, more so than Bitcoin). U.K. High Court Judge Martin Chamberlain ruled that McCormack’s comments caused “serious harm” to the reputation of Wright, but also that Wright “advanced a deliberately false case and put forward deliberately false evidence.” As a result, Wright was entitled to recover only nominal damages of 1 British pound (about $1.23). Magistrate Judge Henry Pitman.
And you all at Square just put out a paper with Ark that described how actually, Bitcoin mining might incentivize the adoption of renewable energy and it may actually help unlock renewable sources that are stranded or otherwise unused around the world. So can you talk about – for people who like in Nigeria or Sudan who are going to need micropayments, who are going to want to send $5 or $10, can you talk a little bit about your commitment at Square to Lightning, how you can help you understood how Bitcoin will scale in layers perhaps instead of on the main chain, and why you are so committed to Lighting in a time where we are going to get a lot more users? 32 years ago today, these incredibly brave students in Tiananmen Square stood up for freedom. As it should be; Bitcoin 1.0 has been around for five years and given what we know now is already very much an outdated technology. The idea behind obfuscation is an old one, and cryptographers have been trying to crack the problem for years. And they’ve been building some hydro facilities there, they have this mighty river, and incredible natural resources, but the problem is when they build the dam it takes time to connect the transmission lines to the dam, so the project remains fairly inert for awhile, and it’s not that exciting of a development project for that reason.
The problem behind obfuscation is this: is it possible to somehow encrypt a program to produce another program that does the same thing, but which is completely opaque so there is no way to understand what is going on inside? The company also reported having $11.5 million in crypto assets under custody, the same amount as was held at the end of the first quarter. The day the amount halves is called a “halving” or “halvening”. Bitcoin could also process zero transactions per block, and miners would expend virtually the same amount of energy. And go to Ghana that has a bunch of transplants from all over the continent and you witness the same thing every single day. What’s your response to that – that it’s just for criminals, the same sort of stuff that they said in the early ’90s about encryption. Want fully homomorphic encryption? Public key encryption provides that for you as an easy corollary.
He turned over official leadership of the project to developer Gavin Andresen and disappeared from public view. While Zcash introduced zero-knowledge proofs for better privacy on a cryptocurrency network for the first time, SmartCash appears to be a knockoff of Dash that has less than $1 million worth of trading volume over the past 24 hours. Vitalik: So, is there anything else that has happened this past week? As you all probably know, there are billions of people around the world who are completely unbanked, or they are underbanked. People who understand databases realize that blockchains only work as long as there are incentives to keep a sufficient number of non-colluding miners active, preventing collusion is probably impossible, and that scaling blockchains up to handle an interesting transaction rate is very hard, but that no-government money is really interesting. His blockchain working group is looking for more crypto-friendly laws and incentives to pursue, and the industry’s expansion plans have his support. I have no control or say or direction over it.